=====
From rexx@sci.fi:
The lensflare seems a bit out of place, but I like the bumpiness of the ground.

=====
From trioker@wanadoo.fr:
I think that the airplane is too close to the montain.

=====
From brendthess@aol.com:
Terrain - tree-covered areas need better textures.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
good attention to detail.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Funny, as soon as I saw this image, I knew it was yours.  Good concept, but the
scene is
(unavoidably?) a little sparse.  Good landscape and atmosphere.
Airplane wing needs some detail work. An unfortunate trick of the light
makes it look like the wing is casting a huge shadow on the ground.

=====
From clem@dhol.com:
Good idea.  Good research.  Nice, if sparse, scenery.  I 
would have omitted all but the core of the lens flare (i.e. no 
"bubbles").  A bit more variety in the green would be nice.  
Show or at least suggest clearings, streams, etc.  Nice 
image.

=====
From sdevet@istar.ca:
WINSEAT! WIIIIIIIIIIIIIINSEAT!

Don't try to deny it :)


=====
From file:
Would have made a nice landscape, but is unfortunately ruined by the airplane
wing.  Something is not right with the depth here; it appears the wing is
almost resting against the ground.  The lens effect does not help the picture. 
Otherwise, a good landscape.