=====
From sammy@cube.net:
The Planet is slightly too visible. It looks like it's hovering underneath the
clouds. 
But i like the picture. Nice 'alien' quality to the metal.

bye,
Sammy

=====
From seayt01@mail.mgc.peachnet.edu:
Very nice, especially given the primative shapes you used to create it.
=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Nice water, nice sense of scale. 
=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Too dark again.

=====
From shipbrk@gate.net:
Very nice, like the gloomy ambience.  Is the Sentinel II modelled after the
"Sentinel Major" in Stewart Cowley's "Spacecraft: 2000 to 2100 AD"?

=====
From houston.graphics@iname.com:
I like the Sentinel, but the ships to the right just don't sit well, the
texture looks too dull compared to the other ships.  Also the water looks
great at a distance, but up close I think  there should have been something
else to mask it.

=====
From tlyons@gnn.com:

needs more of a focal point.
=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Fits the topic perfectly.

=====
From gshaw@monotix.co.za:
Water looks like oil. Otherwise very nice

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
I think I have the same book as you... with a painting of these ships in it.
Still, a nice image, well executed.

=====
From jull43@ij.net:
Just because if floats as do most alien buildings, that does not make it
interesting to see one more floating building.