=====
From witoslaw@kki.net.pl:
The bottle texture needs improvement

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Since I haven't seen the commercial I don't really know what's going on. What's

in the bottle? Seems dark for water. Great job with the stones!

=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
The stone look good refracted through the water like that.  the water seems
particularly
blue-green, an odd effect for water that shallow, but I accept artistic
licence.
The text on the bottle seems pixellated.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Sloppy texturing of label on bottle prevented you from getting a 20-20-20!
=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
What's "naterial"?

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
The only major problem with this image is the clear pixelation of the bottle
label.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Perhaps laks a bit more reflections to get more realism. Anyhow, I liked it
very much, especialy the rolling stones placement.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
The stones are nicely varied in size, shape, and texture.  But some of them seem
to be floating!

=====
From Martial@Biosys.net:
Oh c'est tres beau! I like the simply feeling. Good works! ;-)

=====
From ulf.schreiber@gmx.net:
This one is one of the best demonstrations of the
limits of only normal-mapped water: Just look at 
the edge between bottle and water: There just
aren't any waves!

Massive amount of stones, with an impressive amount of different
textures that still fit together


=====
From r@138.102.96.24:
Notable for lighting, textures


=====
From r@tk156239.telekabel.at:
Notable for composition, textures


=====
From r@tk156239.telekabel.at:
A very good image. The stone-textures and models are perfect, also the water and
the waves. The image map on the bottle could be better (looks like the
resolution was too low)