=====
From agage@csee.usf.edu:
Very well done.  I would suggest using a smaller antialias threshold in
the future, however.

=====
From witoslaw@kki.net.pl:
Big number of objects makes this scene realistic, but it looks like you forgot
about antialiasing

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Good job with the mice. I also like the toothpaste cap. Nice detail. The faucet
is mostly well done, but it doesn't look like it's going to hold standard
filter attachments or aerator :*)
=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Pleasantly cute. Nice modelling. Nice "feel."
=====
From vogelap@email.uc.edu:
The mice are super-cute!

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Nice idea and some good ideas and some objects.
Some negative points, too: the tap shows very obvious polygon edges.
The lighing shows what I call "flashlight" effect, the light source is _very
close_ to the camera, giving only few and small visible shadows and making the
image appear flat, just like a normal camera with built-in flash
produces. Especially the plant in the rear appears to almost sqyashed to the
wall due to this effect.
Please find out how to use antialiasing, this could greatly improve image
quality.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
What a nice scene! Continue hand-coding!

=====
From Varyk@aol.com:
So that's what mice do at 8:14!  This is very cute.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Good effort.  Many of the objects are quite realistic.  Good textures
everywhere.
If you have a powerful computer, this image could be improved by:
1. Using anti-aliasing to eliminate the jagged edges.
2. Using radiosity to improve the lighting, particularly the corner where the
walls meet.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
A very funny image. Attention to detail is excellent. Very good

=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Cute mice, nice detail in the surrounding scene.