=====
From xeo@home.com:
very good, however, surface tension pulls the water out, making it square, like
the holes in the screen, with a concave center. Very good though

=====
From manorton@tcnet.net:
Nice job, but it would be better if the background was 3d and not an image
map.

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Interesting. I have no idea what's going on :*) Your bubbles are all the same
size. Should they be?
=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Poor technical merit score. Water wets most screens. 
=====
From vogelap@email.uc.edu:
I like this image. I remember looking through a wet screen as a child, so this
brought back some memories!

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
I don't think waterdrops that form on such a screen are spheroid, they would
rather form a "skin" in the holes.
Using antialiasing would have improved the image quality a lot!

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Like it a lot, very subtle and realistic image.

=====
From Varyk@aol.com:
I like the lens effect of the drops revealing views of the scene that is =
blurred in the distance.  It's a shame some of the drops are misplaced.  =
Purists may mark you down for using a photo backdrop instead of rendering=
 it.

=====
From arcana@sinbad.net:
This is a wonderful image. However, from a competition basis, I think I
would have been more impressed if the background scene was actually
modelled, rather than using an image map. Looking at the scene, I can see
the curving edge of a lightsource arcing over the bottom left corner of the
background image. One could think it was a shadow of some sort, lying
naturally on the ground. However, the shadow/spot runs over the "sky" as well.
Again, let me say this is a wonderful image.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Very nice close-up study.  I really like the way different portions of the
background are seen within each drop.

=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Novel concept, interesting viewpoint.  Wouldn't the trapped droplets be a bit
more flattened, and fill up the hole they're in?