=====
From agage@csee.usf.edu:
Very nice!

Trees are maybe a little to regular, but the placement is good.

=====
From manorton@tcnet.net:
DUDE, this is GREAT :)  MANorton

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
You are right, the water is definitely something to be proud of! The rest
of the image isn't too shabby either! About the only thing I can see that could
possibly use some improvement is that the trees seem to look awfully similar in
shape.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
This one looks good, the effects of daylight shining on and into the water are
very good. Unlike many other entries this round this really looks like water :)

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Nice architectural rendering.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Water is very real. Lighting very nice. And it's a rich swimming pool, sure.

=====
From djohnston@iname.com:
Very nice lighting, but with all the white and reflective surfaces, things
are very bright. The water is also very nice, but I would have really
enjoyed getting a chance to see the sculpure in the middle. Oh well. :)

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Fine, light, airy image.  It has a neo-classical look that I like a lot.  Well
done.
The inside water is quite good, particularly in its contrast to the sea
outside.
Wish I could see more of the sculpture...

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
The architecture and lighting are quite striking. The water is ver realistic. A
very attractive image.

=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Radiance, wow!  I've used it, but never for anything this complex.  I always
knew it could do great things, and this image proves it.  Beautiful modeling,
texturing, composition.  The colors are a little skimpy, but not bad.  The
water is especially good.  Quite realistic.


=====
From r@dialup-78-168.infoserv.net:
Goow work! This image invites me to take a swim... looks really good!
Notable for modelling, lighting