=====
From nels1678@tc.umn.edu:
This image has alot of potential, but it is lacking some detail. :) keep with
it.. :)



=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Hey, you're not the only person that feels that way about winning--this contest
always has such incredible entrants! This was a good idea. You might have added
more hopelessness to it; perhaps some buildings of different sizes, or some
indication that the building we *are* seeing is incredibly tall. Maybe there
ought to be some debris floating to the surface? Maybe also an indication of
what's beneath the surface.
=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Too simple. 
=====
From pmccombs@hotmail.com:
Good sunset.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
The water surface is really nice, but the building is somehow strongly
distorted. I cannot quite make out if it's bias or just toppling over or
there's something wrong with the projection. The windows also reflect the sky
at funny angles.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Not be so hard. The final result looks interesting. Perhaps I see a strange
distortion in the lower left part, on the building: camera angle?

=====
From Varyk@aol.com:
major change I would recommend is that the sun would have more of an oran=
gy-red color at the horizon like that (especially with all the clouds.)  =
Nice arrangement, I'm biased towards sparse images.

=====
From djohnston@iname.com:
I think in general, it would have been more appropriate to have the sky
grey, as if the rain had only just let up. It gives more a feeling of
hopelessness, I think. I thiknkit also would have been better to have moer
buildings, and maybe some debris floating by.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
All those bricks placed by hand?  Yes, that must have been a pain.
Some very strange perspective effects happening on the building.


=====
From r@tk156239.telekabel.at:
Hmmm... theres something wrong with the geometry of the building. And by the
way, WHY didn't you use #WHILE loops ???