=====
From jknepley@chisp.net:
The figures look too static, like 3 mannequins floating in water.  There appear
to be two planes of water, one on the top, one on the bottom.

=====
From agage@csee.usf.edu:
Wish my hair did that under water...

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
The water looks weird: it looks like they're in some sort of "water cave",
with a water surface above them and a water surface below them.
=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
Nice theme, and oneof the better uses I've seen of those Poser-people.  It
doesn't 
really look like we're underwater, caustics and media effects would have
helped.
the ladies hair should be flowing.

=====
From amason@cs.uct.ac.za:
looks like the scene is underwater but has water as a floor?

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Hmm, well, you did not tell us _how_ you did the models and the image (except
some words about Poser and Bryce), but rather that you converted them.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Rivers don't have reflective water surfaces on the _bottom_. The figures look
plastic.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
I'm afraid I cannot understand the text file.  Did you render the image in
Bryce, or POV-Ray?  The IRTC is not a POV-Ray-specific competition, so why
discuss the "non-POV origin"?
Interesting interpretation.  I wish the gold was casting a yellow light on the
figures.


=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
The riverbed looks like a second water surface, rather than like sand or
whatever.