=====
From scooby@pld.com:
Original idea.  Image elements are laid out (spread out) too obviously to be
artistically appealing.

=====
From roth@ens.ascom.ch:
Certainly the best interpretation of theme I've seen so far!

=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
Unique intepretation.  Textures are bland (on some objects, apparantly
non-existant)
and there are no shadows.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Only moderately related to topic.
I didn't like the lighting.

=====
From ewgr@abaddon.globalnet.co.uk:
Very nice, a little more effort in detail, a surround for the sink and plug hole
and some turbulence in the water, and you would have really had something.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Interesting interpretation of "elements".
Hmmm, no mixer, no drawers, no sink edge?

=====
From manorton@tcnet.net:
Your sink looks strange.  Nice concept though

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Ouch -- wasteful use of water :).

This is a nice arrangement of objects, but it needs a bit more....

See http://www.serious3d.com/ and read their "free article" for lots of
excellent suggestions on the use of texture and imperfections in modeling.

For example, the butter here is way too perfect, and everything is basically
textured
the same (except for pigment).

Also, the scene is way too tidy.

The concept is good, however.

Dan

=====
From 101741.541@compuserve.com:
Very good idea, but realisation is weak.  Try to put more credibility in
the
environnement you're creating.  When using area_lights, turn "jitter" on...