=====
From d97ta@efd.lth.se:
it has style and atmosphere.
the clouds are maybe a bit thin/stretched out.
the plants aren't your own, and since they are the main
object in the image that's just a pity...


=====
From ewgr@abaddon.globalnet.co.uk:
I think the foreground plants look just grand the way they are.

=====
From buck@cs.byu.edu:
I LOVE the plants.  Very nice job there.  The background is exotic...I
would suggest toning down the lens flare, though.  It detracts from the
rest of the scene.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
This one it's original. The plants are very realistic. Nice concept too.

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Nice!!! However, you need to work on the kinks
in the plants on this one as well.  Still, I like
this one a lot.

BTW I prefer the green plants to salmon-pink.  It keeps
it landed in reality.

The sun looks like a square -- is that a sun or a lamp?

=====
From 101741.541@compuserve.com:
Very nice.  You should have submitted only that one.  (don't worry, I voted
this one wisely).

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
At first, I wasn't sure what you were trying to achieve here.  Then it all
clicked into place.  Genesis!  Fascinating premise and viewpoint.  The
linear/annular visual theme brings a harmony of speed and energy to the scene. 
Great color scheme (far better than "chalky pinkish/salmon" plants).  One of
the few scenes where lens flare doesn't bother me.  What's the dark crescent in
the upper-left center?


=====
From r@fermi.lancs.ac.uk:
Fantastic foreground modelling. I would have dropped the naff sci-fi element and
left it as a nice sunrise/set over an excellently composed scene.
Notable for composition, modelling, lighting