=====
From mikko.oksalahti@dosetek.varian.com:
The big-small contrast works well. Use it more strongly.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Wonderful detail to keep viewer interested. 
Gave you highest rating because of happy feeling, consistent construction.  Too
many other images would have one perfectly photo-realistic object next to a
bunch of sloppy CGS objects or rough, pixelated heigh fields.
=====
From d97ta@efd.lth.se:
lovely image, and yes, it does make me feel at peace :o)
the butterfly wings could use some more work (look in
an encyclopedia and check out the shape of the wings)
the rocks could do with a few more polys, they look more like painted
crystals than boulders worn down with time and weather :)

=====
From buck@cs.byu.edu:
I like your trees, alot.  The textures overall are nicely done, too. 
Are the squirrels missing tails, though?

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Nice idea, and a nice scene.... this would make a good
animation.


=====
From 101741.541@compuserve.com:
Strong artistery gives a very original touch to this image.  Well assumed
unrealistic aspect.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Yes, the squirrels are cute.  Good modelling on many of the objects in the
scene.
Strange lighting effects: stark contrasts within objects, but dim hazy shadows
cast on the ground.  Let me guess: made with a scanline renderer, not a
raytracing.  The overall effect is luminous, but somehow alien.