=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Blur needs more samples?


=====
From egnork@eznet.net:
The simplicity adds dimension to the effects.  Were the smoke only smoke . . .

=====
From Jean-Luc.Peuriere@wanadoo.fr:

For a first try, it's quite good but the image is not antialiased which cut down
a lot quality.
=====
From amarok@geocities.com:
A few more samples for the focal blur would_ve been nice, but then again, maybe
22 days is enough...
The lighting on the cloth hanging down from the table is very interesting.
=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
Good picture, and excellent lighting. I don't think it lacks radiosity, since
lights are
very directionnal. The table cloth is a good alternative to other solutions
already
presented here ;-) If you had access to a Cray C98 like the one 100m from my
office,
I think you should improve strongly the depth of field effect, which needs a
*VERY* long
time to be realistic.

=====
From warwick@troll.no:
Too blurry

=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Cute image, nice ears.  Odd lighting.