=====
From agage@mines.edu:
Nice spark; some background features would be nice.

=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
I think it would have looked much better with a thinner atmospheric sampling.

=====
From mcivor@wolfenet.com:
nice atmospherics, I wonder why there is so much banding in lighting ?

=====
From talious@sprynet.com:
In this instance the alias effects of the atmosphere makes it look like 
the scietist is slightly disjointed with space/time. Glad you didn't 
decide to anti-alias the atmosphere

=====
From lowellr@globaldialog.com:
Not bad.



=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Nice ambient (looks like 60's TV serie).


=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
Mwah, Ha, Ha, Ha!!!

=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Interesting picture.  I like how there's the upside-down reflection of the
figure inside the
"coffee machine".  Though the figure looks like this thumbs are on backwards.

=====
From cfusner@enter.net:
The weird repeating shadow effect created by the atmosphere could be
caused by insufficient sampling. Other than that, it looks good. A
giant coffee maker? Hmm. Could be. But judging from the body language
of the physicist's silhouette, he just remembered he's out of filters.

=====
From alex@astro.queensu.ca:
you've still got artifacts from the atmosphere

=====
From SSchanevil@aol.com:
I like the "mad scientist".

=====
From marvil@algonet.se:
Nice light and idea. A bit more detail wouldn't hurt.


=====

From web_user@griffin.itc.gu.edu.au:
You should have used a higher atmosphere setting except that it would have taken
much longer to render. :(
Notable for lighting


From web_user@firewall.ibertech.com:
Almost 'comic bookish',  wonderful reflection throughout.
Notable for lighting