=====
From agage@mines.edu:
Seems only loosely related to this round's theme.

=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
Many good ideas, but disappointing realization. Lighting effects are really
poor.
Try POV-Ray next time!

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
A bit of "collage" aspect, but very well for 15 years.


=====
From cfusner@enter.net:
Fairly weak connection to theme. Admittedly, the man's "thoughts" are about
physics and math, but it's a stretch. Seems an attempt to throw a lot of
things into one scene just to increase apparent complexity. Really doesn't
take advantage of the stregnths of raytracing much: the same effect could
be acheived by compositing output from simpler 3D rendering techniques. 

=====
From alex@astro.queensu.ca:
like a magazine ad, refreshing change from the rest

=====
From SSchanevil@aol.com:
Some good images, but a little too cluttered.  I guess that was kind of the idea
though, huh.

=====
From marvil@algonet.se:
A bright funny image. Artistic. Nice objects.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
What can I say? Very cheap-looking and boring textures. A little more
fine-tuning of textures and lighting good have done a great job even on these
very simple objects.