=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Gorgeous clock, very nice detailing on the face.  Requires a bit of an effort
to link it to the topic.  Good composition.

=====
From mmandl@aol.com:
Nice modeling. your logo distracts from the artistic merit.



=====
From bbowen@cswnet.com:
I'm glad you explained about how the face was made; I thought it was an image
map at first.

=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
Nice job. I like your attention to detail. I would have liked more objects in
the scene, rather than an image of a single object.


=====
From klynn@minn.net:


Did they really have the hour numbers upside down like that?  Odd that  they
didn't feel that they needed to do that for the days of the month.  --I'll have
to
take a closer look at my friend's regulator!  Good photorealism.
=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
 Also, camera seems to be located at the same height as the clock.
If so, why are we looking down towards the sky?  Is the ground missing?

=====
From shipbrk@gate.net:
Nice attention to detail,especially the moulding around the pendulum box.

=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Beautiful clock.  I've seen old clocks with the "IIII" too.

=====
From jlb36@cornell.edu:
It looks a bit "washed out," and could use more contrast in the colors, but it
looks goo d otherwise

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Well done, but to frontal camera.
Jaime (jaime@ctav.es)

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
Unusual approach - I liked it.