=====
From sroberts@learn.senecac.on.ca:
The glass mountain is a nice concept, especially since it's also a traditional
element of many fairy tales.  It's too bad you didn't include other elements in
the scene, as overall it's rather sparse.

=====
From beliaev@utu.fi:

200,000 years ago?
=====
From seppo.halonen@hut.fi:
If only the mountain got under the 'water' over at the edges... 
GFORGE would have done better job for creating the height field.


=====
From cgallego@nordnet.fr:

Good concept, be be carefull with colours...
http://home.nordnet.fr/~cgallego

=====
From tholal@bga.com:
Very interesting. I like the rock formations and the sky texture.

=====
From klynn@minn.net:

GLASS MOUNTAINS, COOL!
=====
From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu:
   A simple enough image, yet different and striking enough to really
set it apart from the others. This is proof that complexity is not
necessarily better. What a difference having no bottles or 
wine/champange glasses makes.

=====
From timothyea@worldnet.att.net:
Please include some info on what tools you use...

=====
From mickmcm@indigo.ie:
Great concept and a powerful image!


=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
This image doesn't look complete. Perhaps if you cropped a little off the top
and the bottom it would look better a little too much water at the bottom.


=====
From danclegg@uniserve.com:
Looks cool. Not exactly what I would call complex.
=====
From rea@st-and.ac.uk:
More could have been done with some more test-rendering.   The sky-text is
beautiful, but the rest of the image has a blocky, buggy feel to it.   Well
done with the lighting, though.

=====
From jmills@stic.net:
I dig the Idea,man...keep the imagination goin' !!!
jmills@stic.net

=====
From amarok@geocities.com:
Why are the mountains hollow?

=====
From xeo@sprynet.com:
Try not to let the edges of the height feild show. 

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
I don't really get it, but it looks nice and is made of glass, so here's some
points.


From web_user@tonyv.aztec.co.za:
Huge ... imagination.