=====
From sroberts@learn.senecac.on.ca:
Nice image.  Liked the marquetry edging on the desk surface - repetitive
material map?

=====
From jay@map.com:
The faked magnification doesn't correspond to our (the viewers') point of view.
- It really sticks out because of that.


=====
From seppo.halonen@hut.fi:
The glass is floating?

=====
From klynn@minn.net:

Good attention to detail
=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
This image seems incomplete. the placement of the objects appears haphazard.


=====
From danclegg@uniserve.com:
Cool, liked the floor.

=====
From rea@st-and.ac.uk:
Some nice stuff - I like the balanced magnifying glass.   However, is it just
me, or is that wine-glass floating (I may be missing something...)

=====
From mwhite@redshift.com:
Awesome use of mapping!

=====
From jmills@stic.net:
Nice table top!

=====
From amarok@geocities.com:
Really nice table.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
How was the magnifying lens effect done if not by real refraction?
Why did the lens refraction blur the texture?

=====
From uvasst00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
Nice refraction.

=====
From no13@ozemail.com.au:
The textures on the magnifying glass look a little out of scale and unreal.

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
A bit literalistic ("wine glass", "magnifying glass", etc.) ; but not bad.
The curled-up textured newpaper clipping is quite impressive, and the other
object models are good too. 

=====
From dick@buckosoft.com:
I like the wood texture on the table.


From web_user@173-127-214.ipt.aol.com:
Notable for composition