=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Nice idea, execution a bit crowded.

=====
From cgallego@nordnet.fr:

http://home.nordnet.fr/~cgallego

=====
From tholal@bga.com:
Trippy.

=====
From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu:
It looks like it could have been a nice picture, but I personally found that
the
lighting was all wrong. It's very difficult to see much of the details. The
fine points are hidden in the dark sky and shadows. A couple of spotlights
with a little atmosphere could have been more along the lines of what
I think you were aiming for.

=====
From 93semeno@scar.utoronto.ca:
A little dark, but very artistic.

=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
This one is just over my head.


=====
From rea@st-and.ac.uk:
The colour selection was good, but I think the modelling did not fit the
theme.   Possibly a nice concept for 2D work.

=====
From amarok@geocities.com:
Cyber!

=====
From uvasst00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
Well you know George Lucas once said that "A special effect without a story is a
pretty boring thing." And you have lots of nice special effects, but nothing
going on.

=====
From no13@ozemail.com.au:
Nice idea and some excellent texture but I found it hard to focus on any
central
image. A little extra lighting, maybe a spotlight, would have helped.

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
The glass hearts are very original. The sky's a bit plain (maybe add a
starfield?)
and the overall scene could use some warmer lighting. The gold thread is a nice
touch.

=====
From dick@buckosoft.com:
The teardrops look like little sperms to me. ;)


From web_user@173-127-214.ipt.aol.com:
i liked you use of color.


From web_user@tonyv.aztec.co.za:
Notable for originality