=====
Very pretty, and yet so simple.

=====
I've always believed the primary power of raytracers was their ability to render
things in 3D. For all I know this is a very well done e-paint program; soothing
to look at but nothing 3D.

=====
Simple and not technically awe-inspiring, but very, very nice.

=====
Beautiful image - but saddly, almost no feeling of it being a raytracing...perhaps if the contour (if any?) of the mountains had been visible...
=====
Nice use of aspect ratio

=====
Cute picture.  It would make for an interesting poster.  In fact I think I've
seen this exact same image before on a grade school text book.  It's a book
start for POVing, but not really competition material.
=====
Very clean, evocative; but needs something. Maybe a few
early-evening stars; or some tiny house-lights in the hills?

=====
Very Simple Quick Image, but it looks pretty good.


=====

I love this image!

Simple yet elegant.  I find it very similar to a "Vickers" print (Roy Vickers, from Vancouver Island, BC) of which I own three.
=====
The scene is just too simple. It needs /something/ else...

=====
Nice backgroundfade - well - and that's it!

=====
A pleasant scene, all in all. Bit of a waste of a raytracer's potential (nothing
in a silouhette image that couldn't have been done in a paint program), but
I was impressed by the cresent moon as a nice artistic touch. 

=====
Nice and simple. I especially like the narrow size, it accentuates the 
sillhouette (sp?) mountain effect.