=====
From timk@jtse.com:
Very funny. I did not read the description before viewing "That's Life"
for the first time. And I kept expecting something to happen. When the paper
started moving I thought it might be poltergeist or something. And then the
fish again. ROFL!

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

I liked the concept and the animation was very well done, realistic movement of
the tail.... nice texturing.
=====
From lou_bruce@yahoo.com:
Kudos on the fish model and texture. Too bad about the raytracing render time
with refraction. The animation needed a little more variation and some dynamics
would have helped also. Maybe a few little turns or an elevation change or a
slow barrel roll. You do get the most points for most efficient use of a single
sequence.

=====
From vansickl@erols.com:
Nothing happens.


=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Piti the introduction is so jerky (zoom on the fishbowl).
Image quality is good and the idea of a boring life gets through loud and
clear.

The fish's moves could do with undulations of it's body - it looks like a still
submarine only propulsed by unseen propelers or turbines.
I had to read the text to understand that the page was floating in the breeze -
maybe because its movement was so smooth. Check it out, when the breeze blows
in
your office, it rather is pretty fast at moving paper about.

=====
From neilryan@mtco.com:
A very nice looking scene.  Camera movement
at the beginning needs some work.  I would have
liked to see more movement from the fish.  I also
think some water in the bowl would have been nice.


=====
From file:
The fish model is beautiful.  The story makes me sad.
Notable for originality