Spurious Precision in Meta-Analysis of Observational
Research
by Zuzana Irsova, Pedro R. D. Bom, Tomas Havranek, and Heiko
Rachinger
Project Website: https://meta-analysis.cz/maive/
MAIVE addresses a fundamental problem in meta-analysis of observational research: spurious precision.
Traditional meta-analysis assigns more weight to studies with lower standard errors, assuming higher precision. However, in observational research, precision can be manipulated through p-hacking and other questionable research practices, invalidating:
MAIVE implements an instrumental variable approach to limit bias caused by spurious precision in meta-analysis.
install.packages("MAIVE")install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("PetrCala/MAIVE")library(MAIVE)# Prepare your data
data <- data.frame(
bs = c(...), # Effect sizes
sebs = c(...), # Standard errors
Ns = c(...), # Sample sizes
study_id = c(...) # Study IDs (optional)
)
# Run MAIVE with defaults (PET-PEESE, instrumented SEs, no weights)
result <- maive(
dat = data,
method = 3, # PET-PEESE (default)
weight = 0, # No weights (default)
instrument = 1, # Instrument SEs (default)
studylevel = 2, # Cluster-robust (default)
SE = 3, # Wild bootstrap (default)
AR = 1 # Anderson-Rubin CI (default)
)
# View results
print(result$beta) # MAIVE estimate
print(result$SE) # Standard error
print(result$Hausman) # Hausman test
print(result$`F-test`) # First-stage F-testThe maive() function expects a data frame with:
| Column | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | bs |
Primary estimates (effect sizes) |
| 2 | sebs |
Standard errors (must be > 0) |
| 3 | Ns |
Sample sizes (must be > 0) |
| 4 | study_id |
Study identification (optional, for clustering/fixed effects) |
Other column names can be mapped with the estimate,
se, n, and study_id arguments. A
column named study_id is used as the study identifier
wherever it sits. If there is no such column and no
study_id argument, the fourth column is used with a warning
that names it, so a moderator or year kept in column four does not
silently drive the study dummies and clustering. With a study
identifier, the data needs at least the number of unique studies plus
three rows.
If your effect sizes already live in a metafor escalc()
data frame or an rma() fit, convert them with
maive_from_metafor() rather than rebuilding the frame by
hand. It takes sqrt(vi) as the standard error (pasting
metafor’s variance into sebs raises no error but shifts the
estimate) and reads sample sizes from the object, never from the
variance:
dat <- metafor::escalc(measure = "SMD", m1i = ..., sd1i = ..., n1i = ...,
m2i = ..., sd2i = ..., n2i = ...)
result <- maive(maive_from_metafor(dat), method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 0, SE = 3, AR = 1)Rows of an rma.uni fit are taken through the fit’s
subset and missing-value masks, so a study_id
vector for the original data stays aligned. rma.mv and
rma.glmm fits are refused rather than flattened.
waive() function - downweights spurious precision and
outliers) - DetailsThe function returns:
vignette("introduction")?maive and
?waive.github/DEVELOPMENT-WORKFLOW.md.github/CRAN-SUBMISSION.md# Create example data
set.seed(123)
Ns <- sample(100:1000, 50, replace = TRUE)
data <- data.frame(
bs = rnorm(50, mean = 0.3, sd = 0.2),
sebs = 2 / sqrt(Ns) * runif(50, min = 0.8, max = 1.2), # precision driven by sample size
Ns = Ns,
study_id = rep(1:10, each = 5)
)
# Run MAIVE
result <- maive(data, method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 2, SE = 3, AR = 1)
# Compare with standard estimate
cat("MAIVE Estimate:", result$beta, "\n")
cat("Standard Estimate:", result$beta_standard, "\n")
cat("Hausman Test:", result$Hausman, "\n")
# Use WAIVE for more aggressive correction (downweights spurious precision + outliers)
result_waive <- waive(data, method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 2, SE = 3, AR = 1)
cat("WAIVE Estimate:", result_waive$beta, "\n")If you use MAIVE in your research, please cite:
Irsova, Z., Bom, P.R.D., Havranek, T., & Rachinger, H. (2025). Spurious precision in meta-analysis of observational research. Nature Communications, 16, 8454. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63261-0
Keane, M., & Neal, T. (2023). Instrument strength in IV estimation and inference: A guide to theory and practice. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 1625-1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.12.009
Tipton, E. (2015). Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with cluster-correlated data. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000019
We welcome contributions! Please see our GitHub repository for:
MIT License - see LICENSE file for details.
Questions? Contact the maintainer or visit our project website.