CRAN Package Check Results for Package fmdates

Last updated on 2024-09-14 17:48:19 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.1.4 4.27 44.30 48.57 ERROR
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.1.4 4.05 32.08 36.13 ERROR
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.1.4 82.57 ERROR
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.1.4 88.82 ERROR
r-devel-windows-x86_64 0.1.4 6.00 65.00 71.00 ERROR
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.1.4 7.37 45.24 52.61 NOTE
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.1.4 4.60 44.70 49.30 NOTE
r-release-macos-arm64 0.1.4 31.00 NOTE
r-release-macos-x86_64 0.1.4 46.00 NOTE
r-release-windows-x86_64 0.1.4 6.00 68.00 74.00 NOTE
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 0.1.4 31.00 NOTE
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 0.1.4 49.00 NOTE
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 0.1.4 8.00 75.00 83.00 NOTE

Check Details

Version: 0.1.4
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package anchors: generate_schedule.Rd: Period-class Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the package itself and the base packages. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64

Version: 0.1.4
Check: LazyData
Result: NOTE 'LazyData' is specified without a 'data' directory Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64, r-oldrel-macos-arm64, r-oldrel-macos-x86_64, r-oldrel-windows-x86_64

Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR Running ‘testthat.R’ [5s/7s] Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed. Complete output: > library(testthat) > library(fmdates) > > test_check("fmdates") [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ] ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Error ('test-calendars.R:28:3'): Sydney calendar is correct ───────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), syd_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:28:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:55:3'): Melbourne calendar is correct ────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), mel_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:55:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:84:3'): NYC calendar is correct ──────────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365), hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:84:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:110:3'): London calendar is correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365), hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:110:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:131:3'): TARGET calendar is correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:131:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:158:3'): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20140101) + days(0:364), akl_hol_2014))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:158:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:187:3'): Toyko calendars are correct ─────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:187:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:215:3'): Zurich calendars are correct ────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:215:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:238:3'): Hong Kong calendars are correct ─────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:238:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:257:3'): Oslo calendars are correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:257:3 [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ] Error: Test failures Execution halted Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang

Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR Running ‘testthat.R’ [3s/5s] Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed. Complete output: > library(testthat) > library(fmdates) > > test_check("fmdates") [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ] ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Error ('test-calendars.R:28:3'): Sydney calendar is correct ───────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), syd_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:28:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:55:3'): Melbourne calendar is correct ────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), mel_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:55:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:84:3'): NYC calendar is correct ──────────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365), hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:84:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:110:3'): London calendar is correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365), hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:110:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:131:3'): TARGET calendar is correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:131:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:158:3'): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20140101) + days(0:364), akl_hol_2014))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:158:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:187:3'): Toyko calendars are correct ─────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:187:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:215:3'): Zurich calendars are correct ────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:215:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:238:3'): Hong Kong calendars are correct ─────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:238:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:257:3'): Oslo calendars are correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:257:3 [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ] Error: Test failures Execution halted Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc

Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR Running ‘testthat.R’ [8s/16s] Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed. Complete output: > library(testthat) > library(fmdates) > > test_check("fmdates") [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ] ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Error ('test-calendars.R:28:3'): Sydney calendar is correct ───────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), syd_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:28:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:55:3'): Melbourne calendar is correct ────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), mel_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:55:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:84:3'): NYC calendar is correct ──────────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365), hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:84:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:110:3'): London calendar is correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365), hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:110:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:131:3'): TARGET calendar is correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:131:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:158:3'): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20140101) + days(0:364), akl_hol_2014))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:158:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:187:3'): Toyko calendars are correct ─────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:187:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:215:3'): Zurich calendars are correct ────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:215:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:238:3'): Hong Kong calendars are correct ─────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:238:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:257:3'): Oslo calendars are correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:257:3 [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ] Error: Test failures Execution halted Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang

Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR Running ‘testthat.R’ [8s/13s] Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed. Complete output: > library(testthat) > library(fmdates) > > test_check("fmdates") [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ] ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Error ('test-calendars.R:28:3'): Sydney calendar is correct ───────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), syd_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:28:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:55:3'): Melbourne calendar is correct ────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), mel_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:55:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:84:3'): NYC calendar is correct ──────────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365), hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:84:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:110:3'): London calendar is correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365), hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:110:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:131:3'): TARGET calendar is correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:131:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:158:3'): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20140101) + days(0:364), akl_hol_2014))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:158:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:187:3'): Toyko calendars are correct ─────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:187:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:215:3'): Zurich calendars are correct ────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:215:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:238:3'): Hong Kong calendars are correct ─────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:238:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:257:3'): Oslo calendars are correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:257:3 [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ] Error: Test failures Execution halted Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc

Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR Running 'testthat.R' [5s] Running the tests in 'tests/testthat.R' failed. Complete output: > library(testthat) > library(fmdates) > > test_check("fmdates") [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ] ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Error ('test-calendars.R:28:3'): Sydney calendar is correct ───────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), syd_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:28:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:55:3'): Melbourne calendar is correct ────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), mel_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:55:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:84:3'): NYC calendar is correct ──────────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365), hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:84:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:110:3'): London calendar is correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365), hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:110:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:131:3'): TARGET calendar is correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:131:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:158:3'): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20140101) + days(0:364), akl_hol_2014))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:158:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:187:3'): Toyko calendars are correct ─────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364), hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:187:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:215:3'): Zurich calendars are correct ────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:215:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:238:3'): Hong Kong calendars are correct ─────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:238:3 ── Error ('test-calendars.R:257:3'): Oslo calendars are correct ──────────────── Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365), h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:257:3 [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ] Error: Test failures Execution halted Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64